Understanding Fallacies

Add to iGoogle    Get the Do Good Gauge Fallacy Randomizer Gadget by clicking on the Google Icon

Missing the Point

Begging the Question
(petitio principii)

The truth of the conclusion is assumed by the premises. Often, the conclusion is simply restated in the premises in a slightly different form. In more difficult cases, the premise is a consequence of the conclusion.

Example

  1. Since I'm not lying, it follows that I'm telling the truth.
  2. We know that God exists, since the Bible says God exists. What the Bible says must be true, since God wrote it and God never lies. (Here, we must agree that God exists in order to believe that God wrote the Bible.)

Proof

Show that in order to believe that the premises are true we must already agree that the conclusion is true.

Reference

Barker: 159, Cedarblom and Paulsen: 144, Copi and Cohen: 102, Davis: 33

Reference Guide
Fallacy Summary

The content of this Fallacy originated from Stephen Downes Guide to Logical Fallacies.

 

Creative Commons License
The Do Good Gauge is licensed to Scott Nesler under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
.

Add to iGoogle     Get the Do Good Gauge Quote Randomizer Gadget by clicking on the Google Icon